Give me options or give me death
Both of them are saying exactly the same thing. "This *thing* should work exactly *this* way because that's what makes the most sense based on my experiences" - which completely misses on of the coolest points about aggregation.
Good aggregation allows users to round up large quantities of content and deal with that content on the users own terms.
Personally, I aggregate in many different ways. My blogroll is set to aggregate publishing pings, my sidebar aggregates three very different feeds and publishes out the headlines by source (I don't want "Sidewalk Chalk" chocolate in my "World Tour" peanut butter). Newzcrawler keeps track of tens of feeds for me and stores them in nice little folders that I can deal with on a number of levels - chronologically, by source or by keyword.
There's a lot more to aggregation in my life than what happens inside of Newzcrawler (or Radio is Paolo's) and the flexibility is what I value most.
More choices, not less, provide strong value to customers. Honing in on one specific mechanism that organizes things this way or that way simply means that you are comfortable making a bet that your users will see things the same way.
I guess I just don't see it the same way.
See this post as it first appeared on the original site.
1 comment
Comments are closed - these are kept exactly as they were left.
Paolo Valdemarin, April 24, 2003
I'm sorry, I did not absolutely wanted to imply that this approach is the "only one" to go, but only that it's the one I'm more comfortable with. The great thing about software and open standards is that anybody can develop applications, and anybody can choose the one he prefers.
I'm sure that you will keep having lots of options to choose from and you will be able to aggregate your feeds according to your needs.
Then, if some developer at some time will create an aggregator that will be flexible enough to make you, me, or even Dave happy, then he will be the winner. Until somebody will develop a better solution.
Isn't this great?