Quick - someone give me a good reason why Blogware should continue to
support RSS 0.91.
Quick again - someone give me a good reason why Blogware should support
multiple RSS versions at all.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
by
Ross
at 12:13PM (EST) on November 21, 2003 | Permanent Link
Comments
user preference
by
Winston
on Sun 23 Nov 2003 10:32 AM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Because there are religious wars over which is the "best" version of RSS. Some people seem to have fierce opinions about this. It would be nice to just let everybody have their favourite rather than "taking sides." Does it add a significant amount of overhead (human, machine, or financial)?
Re: user preference
by
Ross
on Mon 24 Nov 2003 09:58 AM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Yeah, I get the religiousity of the question of "best", but my guess is that our users won't - and probably won't care. They are going to be more interested in the features that their RSS offers and what benefits that RSS offers them.
There's no real cost to supporting two or three or five versions, until the differences between those various versions are so great that the benefits offered to users of those feeds are substantially different - that's where significant support and maintenance costs come into play. I'm tossing around the idea that perhaps we should just pick a horse and give it to our users in order that we can give them the best possible feed that we can and not make them pick. After all, selecting an RSS feed type isn't something that the average bear is going to need to understand in order to use the product. If it works, why clutter up the UI and confuse the customer even further by asking them questions that are only really required to placate an almost irrelevant religious sect. Perhaps this response should have been an entry instead ;) Re: Re: user preference
by
Winston
on Wed 26 Nov 2003 09:42 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Well, most of the features in blogware are things that most users won't touch.
We're not really asking the customer to answer this question. They probably won't even find the place to change this if they don't ask for it. Like all the other features in blogware, if they don't care, they'll leave it alone. If they do care, they already know exactly which one they want and why. I don't think that 5 (or 10) items on a drop-down menu is more cluttered than 2 -- especially when they're in numerical order. If it's a problem on the back end to support it, I can see considering dropping it. But as far as improving customer experience, I think this change would be invisible to all customers except for those who prefer the version(s) you're deciding not to support. Re: Re: Re: user preference
by
Winston
on Wed 26 Nov 2003 09:43 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Cool. The replies are indenting. When did this start?
Re: Deprecating RSS Support
by
TheRoss
on Sat 03 Jan 2004 01:47 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
I'd vote for just picking one (but I'm not a Blogware customer). RSS 1.0 if you value RDF, RSS 2.0 if you don't.
Re: Re: Deprecating RSS Support
by
Ross
on Sat 03 Jan 2004 01:56 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
...and what about Atom feeds now that its becoming a dot on reality's horizon?
Re: Re: Re: Deprecating RSS Support
by
TheRoss
on Sun 04 Jan 2004 01:33 AM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
That's trickier-
If people start building cool stuff around Atom, it be a shame to be left out. Any justification for abandoning one in favor of the other is probably a year or more away. But that's just me pulling guesses out of my ass. Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: Weblogs that reference this article:
|
Blogroll 2.0
Make a Donation to the Tour For Kids!
Search
"Random Bytes" is a produced for and by Ross Rader. Everything else is just a happy byproduct. The views expressed here belong to me and not my employer.. Contact Me
Feel free to use my contact information to get in touch for work related items. email: ross@tucows.com tel. +1.4165385492 cel. +1.4168288783 MSN. ross@tucows.com Local Topics
Recent Articles
Recent Comments
Recent Visitors
jamessmithforum - Tue 15 Dec 2009 03:21 AM EST
ahmed100 - Tue 08 Dec 2009 06:49 AM EST
Andrew C - Fri 04 Dec 2009 09:57 PM EST
maxvoice - Mon 30 Nov 2009 06:33 AM EST
ahmed1212 - Thu 19 Nov 2009 09:20 PM EST
Login
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|